R RegData

eCTD 4.0

eCTD 4.0 and controlled vocabularies

eCTD 4.0 shifts regulatory submissions from document management to structured data. Controlled vocabularies are now a validation requirement, not a formatting preference β€” and each authority manages its own code lists on its own release cycle.

eCTD 4.0 Controlled Vocabularies Health Authorities

What changes with eCTD 4.0

The shift from eCTD 3.2.2 to 4.0 is not just a structural update β€” it introduces a fundamentally different data model. Submissions must carry validated, structured metadata drawn from authority-published code lists. Where 3.2.2 tolerated free text in many fields, 4.0 enforces vocabulary compliance at validation time.

Metadata validation

CV codes must match authority-published lists exactly. Mismatches trigger submission rejection.

Authority-specific lists

EMA, FDA, Swissmedic and others each publish and version their own code lists independently.

Ongoing alignment burden

Code lists update on different cycles. Keeping internal systems aligned requires active monitoring.

Go deeper in the secure portal

The public lookup above shows what is published. The secure portal lets you work with it β€” cross-authority comparisons, term-level diff between versions, and AI-assisted mapping between HA code lists and your internal Reg App vocabularies.

Key authorities

  • EMA β€” SPOR / NCA code lists
  • FDA β€” SPL controlled terminology
  • Swissmedic β€” eCTD 4.0 local lists
  • Health Canada β€” structured submission terms
  • PMDA β€” Japanese regulatory CVs